Here are some protesters from Holy Trinity taking part in the wave, yesterday's march in London, designed as a prelude to the Copenhagen conference on climate change. The Tearfund banners nicely make the point that the poor, as ever, are most vulnerable and need protection.
Congratulations to our demonstrators for making their voice heard.
Quite often on my day off I listen to Desert Island Discs on Radio 4. I don't always listen - it depends on the subject - but it is interesting to speculate what one's own Desert Island Discs would be.
I think if I could choose just one CD for desert island listening it would be Handel's Messiah.
It's been something of a Messiah weekend - I always listen to Messiah during Advent and Passiontide anyway but yesterday Holy Trinity hosted a superb performance of Handel's masterpiece by the Redhill & Reigate Choral Society - I got a free ticket in return for welcoming the Deputy Mayor and pointing out where the fire exits were, and today we concluded our consideration of Luke 3.1-6 this morning by meditating on the aria 'Every valley shall be exalted.' Wonderful.
If I had to choose my Messiah best bits they would be:
'And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed'
'The trumpet shall sound and the dead shall be raised'
'Worthy the lamb that was slain"
But there is so much else that is wonderful: the deeply affecting 'Thy rebuke hath broken his heart,' the joyful 'How beautiful are the feet;' the triumpant 'Hallelujah', and for preachers everywhere 'The Lord gave the word; great was the company of the preachers.'
Britain's wartime leader of the First World War, David Lloyd George (1863-1945), and her leader during the second, Winston Churchill (1874-1965), were rivals, friends, and colleagues for much of their lives. For a time theywere members of the same party, the Liberals, where both were involved in significant pieces of progressive social reform. Later Churchill returned to the Conservative Party.
Richard Toye's book examines the strange partnership of these two dominant and domineering political figures of British political life in the 20th century.
Often they violently disagreed with each other. There were furious rows in private, and slanging matches in public, but both sought to foster the myth of an unwavering friendship.
Toye examines the careers of both men - their changing political fortunes - with Lloyd's George's reputation gradually being ecclipsed by Churchill's - and asks why it mattered to both men not only to remain friends, but to present to the outside world the myth of a friendship, whose reality was far more complex and mixed than either would readilly admit.
Here is Bishop Nick explaining what his book is really about and how the media mangled the story. At the very least it has given an airing to what Christmas is really about.
You can hear his excellent interview on Radio 4 here. Go to 0819.
Hallelujah. At last some sense on 'faith schools.'
I cringe every time I hear that dreaded phrase. I long for someone to tell the Government that in the Church of England we don't have faith schools, but church schools.
Now the Headmaster of a Church of England high school has written in the Church Times setting the record straight.
I became a big fan of church schools during my curacy in West Norwood where the very excellent St Luke's School, enormously representative of West Norwood, was a big part of parish life.
Last night we had a meeting of the Southwark Diocesan Evangelical Union to talk about the selection of the next Bishop of Southwark. There is quite an extensive consultation process with parishes, individuals, and groups like the DEU being invited to send in their views.
The SDEU is designed to be a meeting place for evangelicals in the Diocese - and therein lies the problem. It is a well known fact that whenever two or three evangelicals gather together there are at least four different views present on virtually any topic you care to mention. Evangelicals are a famously fissiparous lot.
A fellow blogger has been reflecting about the nature of Prostestantism. Once you move away from the monolithic central authority of Rome, and give free reign to individual interpretations of Scripture, is disunity, he asks, an inevitable result. And if it is, is it a price worth paying? I think he thinks it is and I do, too - though we should try to ameliorate its worst effects and that is where the DEU comes in.
Our aim at the DEU is to listen to one another, work out what we agree on, and at least understand each other where we differ.
On the question of what kind of bishop we need there was quite a large measure of agreement, but an interesting difference was how those present interpreted the current ecclesiastical scene.
The glass half full people were fairly upbeat about everything, but the glass half empty people were passionate in their dismay about the state of the diocese. Some of the difference was to do with different experiences in different parts of the Diocese, some of it was to do with different expectations of what the Diocese should be like, but a lot of it was to do with that stubborn fact of reality that people see things differently.
As for the new bishop, he''ll have a big job on his hands and we should pray for those responsible for nominating him.
Rwanda has become the 54th nation to join the Commonwealth. Originally membership was just for countries with a colonial tie to the UK, but an exception was made a few years ago for Mozambique, and now the Rwandans have joined up too.
Not only have they signed up to the Commonwealth values of democracy and the rule of law, but the people of Rwanda have started playing cricket.
The British Empire is I think the first empire in history that has been able to run a successful old boys association for former members. One cannot imagine a similar gathering, presided over by the daughter of the last emperor, of states formerly occupied by, say, Nazi Germany or Communist Russia, but somehow the Commonwealth keeps going and it is even recruiting new members.
This afternoon our church resounded to the sound of the lovely Nigerian praise song'We are saying thank you Jesus, thank you my Lord.'The occasion was a Nigerian-style thanksgiving service for a family in our church who have been through some really hard times, but in the midst of all this have found that they want to give thanks to God for his grace, and his sustenance.
There is a certain British tendency to moan or issue a rather self-pitying 'why me?'when troubles come. Today we had modelled a radically different approach.
Today's joyful service expressed the diversity and vitality of our growing church and contrasted sharply with today's gloomy articles in the Times predicting the virtual extinction of the Church of England.
OK the credit crunch is affecting the Church, like virtually every other charity in the land, but by the grace of God our church has grown year on year for the last eight years and every problem the PCC is grappling with at present is a problem of growth not decline.
The reports of the Church's death are greatly exaggerated. I'm thinking of inviting The Times to Redhill.
A drunken student who urinated on a war memorial has been spared jail by a merciful judge.
Of course none of this was the fault of the event's organisers Carnage UK, after all they have a safe drinking policy posted on their website, but might the name - Carnage (–noun 1. the slaughter of a great number of people, as in a battle; butchery; massacre) have misled impressionable youths into thinking that something more than a Sunday school tea party was in view for their night out on the town?
The student has admitted his guilt, but what about the' grown-up'?
Before the Reformation Harlem's Grote Kerk ('big church') was the Catholic Cathedral, but the Dutch Reformed Church has neither bishops or cathedrals, so the status of the building, if not its architectural splendour, is somewhat diminished.
A feature of many of these churches is a 'reformed' layout of the church furnishings with a prominent pulpit, rising above a table, with the people gathered around the table on three sides of a square. This picture (I think from from Delft) gives an idea of how many English churches would have looked immediately after the reformation:
Like many such churches in Holland the Grote Kerk is huge, very light, and spacious inside. The picture above merely shows the side aisle. Below is a picture of the ornate, recently restored ceiling above the crossing.
This weighty tome consists of a series of essays by scholars from both sides of the Atlantic interacting with David Bebbington's seminal Evangelicalism in Modern Britain .
Notwithstanding points of contact with the Puritans of the 17th century and the Protestant reformers of the 16th, Bebbington argued that the evangelicals of the early 18th century comprised a new religious movement whose hallmarks were biblicism (a focus on the bible); conversionism (a belief in the importance of conversion); crucicentrism (a focus on the cross), and activism.
A crucial part of Bebbington's thesis was that evangelicalism's activism was what distinguished it from earlier movements and that this activism arose from its distinctive doctrine of assurance, which itself derived from the Enlightenment origins of the movement.
The writers in this new volume dissent from Bebbington's thesis arguing that there was a greater continuity between the early evangelicals and their Puritan and Reformation forbears than Bebbington allows; that early evangelicalism was less influenced by the Enlightenment than Bebbington has suggested (and in fact may be a a reaction to it); and that neither the evangelical doctrine of assurance nor the activism that followed it were quite as novel and therefore without historical precedent as Bebbington suggests.
Its a fascinating and wide ranging collection of essays drawing upon the work of specialists in Puritan, Reformation, & Evangelical studies in England, Scotland, Wales, and New England. It concludes with a good natured response from Bebbington himself who graciously concedes some of the points made against his work, especially the evangelical continuity with Puritanism, whilst restating his central thesis in a modified manner.
'Don't label me, let me grow up and choose for myself.' Let your child remain a blank sheet of paper and let them find their own destiny.
It sounds like a good idea but it would involve the wholesale abdication of the responsibility of parenthood and the end of all serious attempts at educating the young.
Parents and teachers alike are in the business of educating kids and that involves teaching them about what is right and what is wrong and how to lead their lives.
Most parents seek to pass on to their offspring the benefits of the wisdom they have acquired through life. If a parent has come to believe that the claims of Jesus Christ are true he or she will naturally seek to commend that faith to their child, but that doesn't mean that the kids are not able to choose for themselves later on.
Anyone who has ever lived with a teenager will know that a crucial part of adolescence involves choosing for yourself what to believe. Few teens will do or believe something just because their mum or dad says so, or because they were taught it in Sunday school.
In actual fact, a Christian education, far from robbing a child of choice, facilitates choice about the most important issues of life. To deprive a child of the truths of the Christian faith, is to deprive them of the choice of following Jesus Christ, and the opportunity to receive the treasures of the Gospel, but to give them the facts about Jesus, and allowing them to meet with people who believe in him, allows them to make an informed choice for themselves.
According to The Times the children who feature on the new atheist ad campaign are the children of evangelical musician, Brad Mason.
The paper comments "With the slogan “Please don’t label me. Let me grow up and choose for myself”, the youngsters with broad grins seem to be the perfect advertisement for the new atheism being promoted by Professor Dawkins and the British Humanist Association. Except that they are about as far from atheism as it is possible for them to be.'
All this of course is powerful evidence that (1) God exists and (2) he has a sense of humour.
How wonderful that God should so guide the hand of Dawkins and his friends that from thousands of stock images of children in a picture library they should unerringly pick these two little Christians.
Compare this, a promotional email from a church in Arizona, quoted by David F. Wells:
Is your life everything you want it to be? You hear all kinds of offers of ways to improve your life, but do they really work? God is offering you a way to make your life everything you truly want it to be.
with this:
"If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me." (Mark 8.34
First it was the atheist bus, now its the Christian bus shelter.
Church Ads.net is encouraging local churches to sponsor a 'Christmas Starts with Christ' ad at their local bus shelter.
Bishop Nick has commented about the scheme: 'This year's atheist bus adverts backfired (for the atheists) by putting God on the public agenda and provoking people to ask if he is there. Well, Christians now have a chance to say a firm and confident 'yes – and he looks like Jesus! Christmas is his festival.'
Just before I left for church yesterday evening I had a phone call from an undergraduate of the University of York. It happens every year.
We had a nice chat about whether I had visited the campus recently (I had) and what I thought of the changes and whether I enjoyed reading the alumni magazine (I did), and then we moved on to what we both knew was the real business of the call: whether I wanted to make a gift aided donation to the good old UoY.
Despite fond memories of university life I can't help thinking that an organisation that is building an additional campus for £500m can't really need my humble contribution. Yes I did say additional campus - they've got one already, and now they're building an extra one for a cool 0.5 billion.
Where do they get the money?
I share this with blog readers because this week I am working on a sermon about 'education' in our series 'Discovering God's Plan for...' and it strikes me that as well as having become obsessed with education, we as a nation are expending extraordinary amounts of money on it. Mind boggling amounts of money.
But exactly why? Why are we doing it and what do we think it will achieve?
Today in the Church of England calendar the life and ministry of Charles Simeon is commemorated. The pictures show Eduoart's famous silhouettes of Simeon's rather expressive preaching style.
2009 is the 250th anniversary of Simeon's birth and Simeon's Trustees have circulated a leaflet about their work and Simeon's life for the members of the churches of which they are patrons, including Holy Trinity.
The Cambridge preacher came to faith when as an undergraduate he received a summons to receive Holy Communion in his college chapel that provoked a crisis of conscience. He later explained: 'Satan himself was as fit to attend as I.'
But relief for his troubled soul came as he read in a devotional book the words 'the Jews knew what they did when they transferred their sin to the head of the offering.' In the following words Simeon explains the train of thought that led from the sacrifices of the Old Testament to peace with Christ: "What! may I transfer all my guilt to another? From that moment on I sought to lay my sins on the sacred head of Jesus, and on the Wednesday began to have a hope of mercy; and on the Thursday that hope increased; and on Friday and Saturday it became more strong; and on the Sunday (Easter Day, April 4, 1779) I awoke early with those words upon my heart and lips, Jesus Christ is risen to-day; Hallelujah! Hallelujah! From that hour peace flowed in rich abundance into my soul; and at the Lords Table in our chapel I had the sweetest access to God through my blessed Saviour."
That spiritual breakthrough was the wellspring of a ministry in Cambridge that was to last for 54 years.
At what point does legitimate criticism of an elected official become a form of hounding or even bullying?
The media treatment of Gordon Brown over the unfortunate incident of the misspelled condolence letter has some ugly aspects. Its been over-the-top, unforgiving, and in the publication of the transcript of a private phone call, disgraceful.
Getting the name of a bereaved or deceased person's wrong is every clergyman's nightmare, but it is surprisingly easy to do. If the PM did misspell the name - even that is not clear - he certainly has my sympathy, and he has more than made up for his mistake in his phone call to the bereaved mother and his statement to the press.
World leaders gather in Berlin tonight to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Part of the commemoration involves a giant set of dominoes :
a fitting image for the events of 1989 where the collapse of the Berlin Wall was followed by the collapse of communist regimes across Europe, and later the collapse of the USSR itself. No one seemed to have predicted this chain of events. The changes when they happened came with bewildering speed.
Christians throughout eastern Europe were of course powerfully involved in the protest movements that grew in the late 80s. The church - particularly through huge prayer gatherings - was at the very heart of events.
Since 1989, there have been enormous challenges for the united Germany and some easterners retain a certain nostalgia for the GDR, memorably captured in the wonderful film Goodbye Lenin, yet the day that the wall fell was a truly great day. May God be praised.
PS Frederick Taylor's book, a kind of biography of the wall is a really good read.
Remembrance Sunday this year had a added poignancy with the increase in deaths from the conflict in Afghanistan and the knowledge that a local family, from our neighbouring parish of St Matthew's, is among those recently bereaved.
At our 11am service we concluded our act of remembrance by singing the national anthem. There was a time when I disagreed with singing 'God save the Queen' as part of worship and in fact I used to refuse to join in, even though I support the monarchy, because I used to think that singing the anthem as part of an act of worship confused too much the kingdom of this world with the kingdom of God.
Latterly I have tended to think differently - partly because I recognise that 'God save the Queen' is in fact a prayer, and a good prayer to offer for the Sovereign. Indeed, the Bible encourages us to pray for our rulers.
But my change in attitude also derives from a consideration of the second verse of the national anthem, which not only prays for God's blessing on the Queen 'thy choicest gifts in store on her be pleased to pour' but makes the powerful point - post the Glorious Revolution of 1688 - that our loyalty to the monarch is limited and conditional: 'may she defend our laws and ever give us cause to sing with heart and voice: God save the Queen.' We do not give an unconditional commitment to our rulers. We look to them to recognise that their power is limited by law, and that they are answerable to the law and responsible for defending the law.
My conclusion is that it is good to sing the National Anthem, but you mustn't leave out verse 2.
It's quite an achievement to write a biography of Vermeer because almost nothing is known about the life of the Dutch painter whose reputation has so grown with the years.
We know he lived in Delft. We know he was married. We know he had lots of children, but we do not even know all their names or exactly how many of them they were.
Unlike Rembrandt he was not given to self-portraiture, and as so no one else thought to paint his likeness, we do not ever know what he looked like.
We know he died at 42 and completed less than 40 canvasses. He was either a very slow painter or he didn't paint very often. And that is about all we know.
This could lead to a very short book, not to say a rather dull one, were it not for the fact that Bailey does two things that more than make up for the paucity of his information about Vermeer's life.
First, he does a wonderful job of painting a vivid picture of 17th century life in Delft. Through his meticulous research we get an insight into the kind of life Vermeer led, and the world he inhabited.
Secondly. Bailey encourages us to peer clearly at Vermeer's paintings, to discern the artist behind the artwork.
All of Vermeer's works have a certain air of mystery, perhaps the greatest mystery of all is the artist, but if we view his works, perhaps we gain some insight into his mind.
OK that's quite a big 'perhaps' - and Bailey does verge on the edge of speculation - but then perhaps so far as Vermeer's works are concerned, that is part of the pleasure.
Pictured: Girl with the Pearl Earring - which we viewed earlier in the year in the in the Mauritshuis or Royal Picture Gallery in the Hague
Yesterday I conducted the funeral of one of my very favourite aunts.
It was a long running family joke that I would do the honours when the moment came: 'you will do my funeral, won't you love?' she would say whenever I saw her.
But she died suddenly and I didn't expect to be taking Aunt Jean's funeral quite so soon.
Her son, my cousin, made a powerful point: his mum led an ordinary life but she was in her way exceptional. She devoted herself wholeheartedly to her family, to her husband of nearly 60 years, to her son Paul, to her grandchildren. Her commitment was exceptional.
Tomorrow I am preaching about marriage - it is also Remembrance Day - and its a notable point that those who grew up in the Second World War with all the privations of that time, like Aunt Jean, have so often led lives marked by the qualities of selflessness and loyalty that have produced marriages that have stood the test of time.
Wild Swans contains the life story of three generations of women from the author's family.
It spans the history of pre-revolutionary China, the revolutionary war and rise to power of the Communist Party and the Cultural Revolution that followed under Mao. In a sense it is the prequel to Chang's biography, Mao the Unknown Story, which I read some years ago.
This is a beautifully written, powerful book. The section dealing with the Cultural Revolution is particularly shocking. We see how the revolution devoured its own children. Chang's parents, devoted Communists, like millions of others, faced unspeakable torture, persecution and abuse.
Chang tells her story without bitterness. There is a restraint and dignity about the way she relates the unfolding story of the tragedy that overtook China under Mao.
Wild Swans eloquently gives the lie to anyone who thinks Maoism was a benign force. If her statistics are correct Mao was personally responsible for more deaths than Stalin and Hitler put together.
A Rocha (The Rock) is an international organisation of Christians involved in conservation.
Peter Harris, the founder and president, is our Crosslinks mission partner and was with us today for all four services. It has been a really good day.
Peter presented us with a framework of a creation made by God, of a suffering creation damaged by sin, and of a renewed creation restored by God's power. He urged us to be involved in caring for the planet because God cares for the world he has created, and because God has a special concern for the poor, who suffer most from the effects of environmental degradation.
He suggested we should speak less about 'the environment', which puts us and our needs at the centre of the world, and more about 'the creation,' which puts God back at the centre - 'the earth is the Lord's and everything in it.'.
You can download Peter's talks in a few days time from the church website
Peter began his talk this evening with this video clip from Australian TV (based I am told by an Australian informant on a true incident):
I was beginning to think the Reformation had never happened. Songs of Praise managed to celebrate All Saints Day without even hinting at the Bible's definition of sainthood or even suggesting that this might be different from the view of the Roman Catholic Church which this programme simply assumed.
Couldn't someone have just opened the Bible - just for a bit- and revealed the truth that the a 'saint' is the New Testament's favourite word to describe a Christian, not a miracle working super Christian, not a departed Christian living in heaven, but a real living common or garden Christian, like you or me.
The real message of All Saints Day, entirely lost to the BBC, is that by grace we are all saints.
"Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us. Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God."
We're just back from a half term break in our favourite county, North Yorkshire, staying at Rivendell, run by our university friend, Ange, and enjoying the scenery of the North York Moors (pictured).
Back in Redhill, children and adults have crowded into the church for our Hallowe'en Light Party and the Surrey Police have distributed 'No Trick or Treat' stickers for us to display on our doors. Meanwhile Bishop Nick is reminding us that All Hallows Eve or All Saints Eve, as we call it today is, is also Reformation Day.
It makes our light party doubly relevant: the light of Christ shining out in the lives of the saints, and the light of the Gospel shining out with fresh vigour and clarity from a renewed and reformed church.
Another famous Anglican featured in The Heart of Faith is the chemist Robert Boyle (1627-1891).
All those A level students who have sweated over Boyle's Law have the author of The Sceptical Chymist to thank for their labours.
But the brilliant scientific mind had a spiritual dimension too. Boyle was a devout Christian and an ardent supporter of Christian mission and bible translation.
He lived before the word 'scientist' had been invented, so he was, in his terms 'a natural philisopher' investigating the natural world that God had created, and giving glory to the creator. This is how he saw it:
'When with bold telescopes I survey the old and newly discovered stars and planets... When with excellent microscopes I discern nature's curious workmanship; when with the help of anatomical knives and the light of chymical furnaces I study the book of nature... I find myself exclaiming with the psalmist, How manifold are thy works, O God, in wisdom thou hast made them all.'
A more contemporary Anglican who features in The Heart of Faith is David Watson.
As a student I attended St Michael-le-Belfrey Church in York where he was the rector. He was the first evangelical preacher that I as a young Christian had ever really heard. His preaching and his writings had a great impact on me and still do.
David gave me a vision for the local church. St Michael's was an exciting, even thrilling place to be part of, and his infectious faith-filled optimism about the work of the gospel was contagious.
He died at the height of his powers at the age of 50. By then we were living in London and I remember us joining a packed congregation in St Paul's Cathedral for his thanksgiving service.
There was a song, often sung at St Mike's, and I think sung that night at St Paul's, based on Psalm 16, and a favourite of David's - he used the first line of it for his biography - it sums up his joy in God that communicated so well
CHORUS For you are God, you are alone are my joy, defend me O Lord
You give wonderful brethren to me the faithful who dwell in your land those who chose alien gods have chosen an alien band
You are my portion and cup it is you that I claim for my prize your heritage is my delight the lot you have given to me
Glad are my heart and my soul securely my body shall rest For you will not leave me for dead nor lead your beloved astray
You show me the path of my life in your presence the fullness of joy To be at your right hand forever for me would be happiness always
CS Lewis in Mere Christianity, quoted in The Heart of Faith:
'Until you have given up your self to Him you will not have a real self...You must throw it away 'blindly' so to speak. Christ will indeed give you a real personality: but you must not go to him for the sake of that. As long as your own personality is what you are bothering about you are not going to Him at all...Look for yourself, and you will find in the long run only hatred, loneliness, despair, rage, ruin, and decay. But look for Christ and you will find Him, and with Him everything else thrown in.'
Radical stuff in a self-obsessed age. I'm struck by the very last sentence, it has overtones of the ending of Romans 8.32:
'He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all—how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things?'
Is 'with Him everything else (is) thrown in' the equivalent of the Pauline 'will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things'?
The Heart of Faith: Following Christ in the Church of England is a series of essays edited by Andrew Atherstone, tutor in history and doctrine at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford.
The book examines 'sixteen influential men and women, spread over the centuries from the early middle ages to the present day' who have found their home in the Church of England, ranging from the Venerable Bede, to the hymnwriter Frances Ridley Havergal, the scientist Robert Boyle, the social reformers William Wilberforce & Lord Shaftesbury, CS Lewis, David Watson, and John Stott.
Over the next few days I will share a few nuggets from the book
Some further reflections about last night's Question Time:
(1) The most chilling moment for me was Griffin's answer to the British-born black man who asked 'where would I go' (ie if the BNP were in power).' 'Oh, you could stay' was the answer.
What was chilling about that? The thought that if the BNP were in power they would decide who could 'stay' and who couldn't.
(2) The attempt to co-opt Sir Winston Churchill into the BNP's cause is particulary distasteful, as it was Churchill in his 'wilderness years' during the thirties, and then as war leader, who led this country in opposition to fascism and Nazism.
(3) In the programme that followed Andrew Neill and Labour MP Diane Abbott discussed the implications of the rise of the BNP. Abbott's take was interesting: new Labour has concentrated on winning support from the middle classes, assuming they could take white working class support for granted, because 'they had nowhere else to go.' But they have found somewhere to go, and Abbott suggested that the way to defeat the BNP was for Labour and the other mainstream parties to reconnect with the white working class.
I admire the young woman who was dragged across the floor of the BBC TV centre tonight as she shouted 'shame on you BBC.'
Although, I happen to think the BBC was right not to ban the BNP (but to leave such a decision to Parliament), I admire her for making the protest that she made, and I admire the BBC for screening it.
She was right to talk about shame, because policies based on racism, anti-semitism, and holocaust denial are shameful, even if the BBC's conduct was not shameful. The Evangelical Alliance have made a good statement here.
As for Question Time itself, the main focus was on the BNP's policies. Good points were made by the other panel members and members of the audience. There is the whole issue of the extent to which votes for the BNP have really been protest votes against the other parties. The Labour MP for Barking has some interesting ideas about that here.
Big news. The Pope is a Catholic and you could be one too.
There is great excitement in all the papers - no less than three full pages, and a leader in The Times, plus this in the Guardian - at the thought that disaffected Church of England clergy may be able to join a kind of Anglican section of the Church of Rome.
Of course, its not really news. There have always been clergy moving in that direction, as well as in the other, and repentant Anglicans have always been welcomed in the Roman fold. But first they must be (re-)ordained - because Anglican orders are viewed by Rome as null and void - ie they must admit that they have never properly been ordained - and then they must embrace the full doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church, thus denying key beliefs they were committed to as Anglicans.
Under the new arrangements Anglicans will be welcomed, and they may be allowed a few outward trappings of Anglicanism, but they will have to renounce its doctrinal heart.
It will be a very odd form of Anglicanism without its reformation heritage. In fact, what exactly would be left?
Far better I think for the Church of England to make generous provision for those who cannot accept the consecration of women bishops, so that the Church of England remains a comprehensive church for the whole nation. Lets agree to differ - as we have always done.
The Prime Minister is a busy man. What with the financial crisis, the war in Arghanistan, and a country to run life must be hectic for Gordon, but now he is being hassled about his view on biscuits.
Apparently he failed to reveal to the readers of Mumsnet details of his favourite biscuit. The press are full of it, but just how ridiculously trivial can you get?
We sung a great new song at our Harvest Thanksgiving services today, you can hear it here and the lyrics are printed below.Written by Keith and Kristyn Getty and Stuart Townend, it begins by speaking of the sovereignty of God over creation ('he calls the sun to wake the dawn); before moving on in verse 2 to speak of God's reconciling plan through the 'second Adam (who) walked the earth,' concluding in the third verse with the return of Christ ('Creation longs for his return') and the renewal of all things ('He renews the land and sky').
Very few contemporary songs deal with the doctrine of creation. This song does this beautifully, whilst spanning the whole biblical revelation from Genesis to Revelation.
Creation sings the Father's song; He calls the sun to wake the dawn And run the course of day Till evening falls in crimson rays. His fingerprints in flakes of snow, His breath upon this spinning globe, He charts the eagle's flight; Commands the newborn baby's cry.
CHORUS Hallelujah! Let all creation stand and sing,"Hallelujah!" Fill the earth with songs of worship; Tell the wonders of creation's King.
Creation gazed upon His face; The ageless One in time's embrace Unveiled the Father's plan Of reconciling God and man. A second Adam walked the earth, Whose blameless life would break the curse, Whose death would set us free To live with Him eternally.
Creation longs for His return, When Christ shall reign upon the earth; The bitter wars that rage Are birth pains of a coming age. When He renews the land and sky, All heav'n will sing and earth reply With one resplendent theme: The glories of our God and King
Ever since September 11th 2001 the Islamic faith has been in the news, but what are we to think of Islam in the light of the many competing voices we hear in the media and elsewhere?
He has studied Islam for much of his life, he has lived in Asia and the Middle East and he has long experience of theological dialogue with Muslims, and he couples this with an evangelical faith, and a firm but winsome commitment to Christian orthodoxy.
Two points that Riddell makes very clear is that there are many different types of Christians and many different types of Muslims. He offers a perceptive categorisation of both, and shows how their different perspectives on key matters of faith interact with each other.
He deals helpfully with the limits and possibilities of Christian-Muslim dialogue, the possibility of evangelism to people of other faiths, as well as addressing matters of public policy which directly affect both Christian and Muslims.
He deals directly with some of the key issues raised by September 11th and the international growth of Islamist terrorism, including the extent to which Islam is a religion of peace and the extent to which the perpetrators of 9/11 can call themselves Muslims.
At each point his judgment is careful, nuanced and clear, making this the best and most comprensive book I have read on this subject.
Today was my day off and today we visited the Wallace Collection, a hidden gem round the back of Oxford Street, containing an extraordinarily rich collection of paintings, furniture, and porcelain - and all for free.
Its most famous work is the Laughing Cavalier, but it also has work by Titian, Rubens, Rembrandt, Reynolds, Canaletto, Gainsborough, Murillo, to name but a few.
A hundred years ago it was thought they had twelve paintings by Rembrandt, but by the early 1990s all but one of the paintings had been reassigned by scholars to the studio of Rembrandt and not to the Dutch painter himself.
Latterly three of the paintings have been re-reassigned back to Rembrandt himself, but the painting that no one has ever doubted is Rembrandt's masterly painting of his son, Titus (pictured above).
There something very moving about this painting which so eloquently but simply conveys a father's affection for his son.
Those bones seem to hold a strange fascination for Times columnist Matthew Parris.
He has returned again to the topic of the relics of St Therese of Lisieux currently touring the country. Now he has visited them himself.
Earlier he had told readers how the prospect of thousands paying homage to the relics had restored his faith in atheism, now visiting the bones in Westminster Cathedral he is shocked to read a sign that proclaims the indulgence that the Pope has granted pilgrims: “One plenary indulgence (complete remission of the temporal punishment due to sin) may be gained each day and may be applied either to a soul in Purgatory or the pilgrim himself or herself.”
Appalled, Parris declares 'I think I am a Protestant atheist.'
30 years ago influential author and theologian, John Piper, sensed God's call to leave the theological college where he was teaching and take up the local church pastorate that he occupies to this day.
During a period of heartsearching he sensed God saying to him:
I will not simply be analyzed; I will be adored.
I will not simply be pondered; I will be proclaimed.
My sovereignty is not simply to be scrutinized; it is to be heralded.
Later his father, a veteran travelling evangelist, wrote these words of advice and admonition about the joys and struggles of local church ministry:
Now I want you to remember a few things about the pastorate. Being a pastor today involves more than merely teaching and preaching. You’ll be the comforter of the fatherless and the widow. You’ll counsel constantly with those whose homes and hearts are broken. You’ll have to handle divorce problems and a thousand marital situations. You’ll have to exhort and advise young people involved in sordid and illicit sex, with drugs and violence. You’ll have to visit the hospitals, the shut-ins, the elderly. A mountain of problems will be laid on your shoulders and at your doorstep.
And then there’s the heartache of ministering to a weak and carnal and worldly, apathetic group of professing Christians, very few of whom will be found trustworthy and dependable.
Then there a hundred administrative responsibilities as pastor. You’re the generator and sometimes the janitor. The church will look to you for guidance in building programs, church growth, youth activities, outreach, extra services, etc. You’ll be called upon to arbitrate all kinds of problems. At times you will feel the weight of the world on your shoulders. Many pastors have broken under the strain.
If the Lord has called you, these things will not deter nor dismay you. But I wanted you to know the whole picture. As in all of our Lord’s work there will be a thousand compensations. You’ll see that people trust Christ as Savior and Lord. You’ll see these grow in the knowledge of Christ and his Word. You’ll witness saints enabled by your preaching to face all manner of tests. You’ll see God at work in human lives, and there is no joy comparable to this. Just ask yourself, son, if you are prepared not only to preach and teach, but also to weep over men’s souls, to care for the sick and dying, and to bear the burdens carried today by the saints of God.
No matter what, I’ll back you all the way with my encouragement and prayers.
Its often used in clergy gatherings to indicate a lofty unconcern about congregational numbers as in 'we're not interested in bums on seats.'
Its an inelegant and unfortunate way to refer to people made in the image of God and for whom Christ died. To me it seems to suggest complete unconcern with whether people hear the Gospel or not.
Clearly a concern for numbers is wrong when we rely on numbers as an indication of spiritual strength as in 'we had 97 people at our prayer meeting' (so God is bound to answer our prayer) or there are 500 people in our church (so we're much better Christians than that lot down the road).'
It seems that a wrong concern for numbers - in the sense of a reliance on numerical strength, not on God's power - was David's self-confessed sin of counting the mighty men in 2 Samuel 24.
On the other hand the Bible has a whole book called Numbers and the book of Acts, to take one example, is full of statistical data (see Acts 1.15, 2.41, 4.4, 21.20).
In both Numbers and Acts the numerical data is closely connected with God's work of saving people and drawing them to himself.
My conclusion? Let's not worry about 'bums on seats', but lets be concerned to take the Gospel to as many people as possible. In that sense, I am concerned about numbers. So far as proclaiming the gospel is concerned - the more the merrier.
I think God thinks that too - compare Genesis 15.1-5 and Revelation 7.9-10 for the promise and outworking of God's plan to multiply his people to such an extent that 'no one can count' them.
This was a birthday present that combined two of my great loves: the seaside and architecture. (Thanks Mark & Pat for a great read).
English heritage has produced a splendid beautifully illustrated architectural history of England's seaside resorts.
I am particularly glad there is a section on Butlins, which filled me with nostalgia for the years during the 90s that I was a Butlins Holiday Chaplain at Bognor Regis. Great fun.
The really strange thing about the Ship of Fools league table of biblical notoriety is that requiring a woman to be silent in church is rated a greater sin that wiping out the whole Amalekite nation. Now that is odd.
Readers of the Ship of Fools website were recently invited to nominate their 'ten worst verses from the Bible.'
The results are rather predictable. Smiting does not go down well, nor does anything that suggests anything less than a fully egalitarian pattern of gender relations (as currently understood). Essentially we are presented with 'The Ten Verses Most Likely to Upset a Reader of The Guardian.'
Fine as far as it goes - as our doctrine lecturer at college used to say - but aren't there more profound things to say about texts of Scripture than whether we like them?
Contrast this with the response given by songwriter/worship leader Matt Redman, when interviewed this week in the Church Times. When asked to nominate his favourite and least favourite bible verses here was his reply: 'we're talking about the inspired word of God here; so I'm not going to go for a disliked part.'
Knowing that I had visited his home country on a couple of occasions a Canadian member of the congregation has lent me Will Ferguon's 'excursions in the great weird north' of Canada.
A gentler, more humbler version of the US, Canada is huge, friendly, and virtually empty. Lots of Canadians live in cities, but this book is taken up with the story of small town - often very small town - Canada.
In addition to all the interest and sometimes sheer wackiness of Ferguson's exploration of the Canadian north there is the moving story of the underground railroad the heroic network of Christian believers, mainly Quakers, who helped slaves from the southern United States escape to freedom in Canada.
Britain abolished slavery throughout the empire, long before the US did. The only possibility of freedom for American slaves was to escape to Canada or 'Canaan' as they referred to it in their spirituals with a conscious reference to the biblical promised land. Songs such as 'Swing low, sweet chariot' and 'Steal away to Jesus' are believed to allude to escape by the Underground Railroad:
Swing low, sweet chariot Coming for to carry me home Swing low, sweet chariot Coming for to carry me home
Steal away, steal away, steal away to Jesus!
Steal away, steal away home, I hain't got long to stay here
The third in a series of blog entries about the conferences of the main political parties.
'Vote for us and you'll earn less and work longer' was how Jeremy Paxman summed up the Shadow Chancellor's speech at the Conservative Party conference yesterday.
Uniquely, for the next election all three parties are proposing cuts in public expenditure. The issue is: how much, and where, and whether what is being proposed is sufficient. What is clear is that we are entering straitened financial times and there is going to be pain all around. Christians will want to urge protection for the most vulnerable.
The Conservatives have the great advantage of having not been in power for 12 years. They can appeal to the electorate's instinct that it is time for a change. With the present electoral system the only real option open to the electorate is to let the other lot have a go. So the Tories could win or there could be a hung parliament and then anything could happen.
The Conservative party historically has stood for tradition, freedom of the individual, the market economy, and limited government. At times Conservative policy can seem like institutionalised selfishness, though the 'One Nation' strand of conservatism has offered a vision of a united nation, and a party that cares for all, including the less well-off
The Conservatives have produced a number of significant social reformers - they number William Wilberforce and Lord Shaftesbury at least nominally among their ranks. The tradition of a Christian-inspired Tory concern for social justice continues with Iain Duncan-Smith's Centre for Social Justice which has set out 'to put social justice at the heart of British politics and to build an alliance of poverty fighting organisations in order to see a reversal of social breakdown in the UK.'
If the Conservatives do take power in the coming year, a great responsibility rests on them coming to power at a difficult time for the nation. We should pray for them.
Stephen Kuhrt, my room-mate at the Diocesan Conference, very generously gave me a copy of his new Grove booklet Church Growth Through the Full Welcome of Children - and very good it is too.
Subtitled 'The Sssh Free Church' Stephen describes how an early Sunday morning service at Christ Church, New Malden, has led to considerable growth among young families in partular.
Building on a strong welcome to young couples bringing their children to baptism - I liked the idea of a customised DVD of the service delivered to each family a few days after the baptism - Christ Church has worked hard to make their church the kind of place families want to come to.
One of the strengths of Stephen's approach, I think, is his assumption that when a non-churched family asks about baptism, there is some real spiritual motivation - however vague, and unformed - behind their request. They may know little about the Christian faith, and even less about a Christian theology of baptism, but the Christ Church model seeks to meet a tentative step towards spiritual things with a warm welcome into the family of the church, where the Gospel can in due course be heard and understood.
'What about Barnsley?' asks Cranmer's curate. Why are evangelicals so drawn to students and the nice places in which they congregate like the fair city of York.
His grace's curate reveals plans for a new evangelical church in York - yes, you'be guessed it - to reach out to the students, but, a glance at the website of the CU of my alma mater reveals that there are no less than eighteen evangelical churches already reaching out to the pagan hordes of the University of York.
Cranmer's curate is making a very good point: why is it York, not Barnsley that is the target for this latest church planting venture?
Behind it all, of course, is the long practised deeply unbiblical strategy of English evangelicals of prioritising 'people of influence in society.' Reach the public schoolboys and the university students, the theory goes, start at the 'top' and the Gospel will trickle down.
It is a terribly flawed strategy both theologically and pragmatically. Theologically, it turns 1 Corinthians 1.26-31 on its head. Pragmatically, it has been a dismal failure.
It has been one of the chief causes of the middle class captivity of the Gospel. It has ensured that places like Barnsley remain spiritual wildernesses, and that cities like Oxford, Cambridge, Durham & York are replete with Gospel preaching churches.
Vanbrugh College is one of the constituent colleges of the University of York.
I like it because I was a member of it for four years and because it is named after an architect, the very excellent Sir John Vanbrugh (1624-1726). In addition to designing Castle Howard and Blenheim Palace he was also an accomplished Restoration playwright.
Today a group of us who were members of the college Christian union met, together with our spouses, for lunch and a chance to catch up on news.
Some of us now have children the age we were when we first met each other and the exciting thing is that they are all going on in their Christian faith. That makes me think of those wonderful words of Psalm 78.4: 'we will tell the next generation the praiseworthy deeds of the Lord.'
May God grant that this new generation will tell the next generation after them.
This is my cousin's 19 year old grandson, Jeremy, with his girlfriend and 5-month old son. Whilst at the Diocesan conference I heard that he had been killed whilst driving to work near to where he lives in Nova Scotia.
His mum and dad, his grandparents, and his brother are especially in my thoughts and prayers today as they go to the Church of the Nazarene, near to their home - a church that we have visited- for his funeral. We pray that God may console them in their loss.
The papers are full of the details of the horrific child abuse of very small children at a Plymouth nursery. The anguish of the parents who do not whether their own children were victims is unimaginable.
The police officer investigating the case described the abuse as 'horrific and devilish.'
It is interesting how in a secular world we still reach for biblical categories to describe the very best and very worst of human behaviour. For me, the Bible is utterly realistic, and faithful to the world as we know it in describing human beings as the 'crown of creation' and also 'desperately wicked.'
There is a kind of sunny liberal optimism that just about works on a nice day in the suburbs, but when I visit Auschwitz, as I did a few years ago, or when I read today's press reports from Plymouth, I need the Bible's robust language of sin, evil, judgment, and hell, alongside all that it says about grace and redemption, to begin to make sense of the world as it actually is, and the reality of my own heart.
I'm just back from the Southwark Diocesan Clergy Conference. On Monday 380 of us travelled from St Pancras by specially chartered train to the Hayes Conference Centre, Swanwick in Derbyshire.
Well how was it? The last one, five years ago, was quite good. This one was very good. I've been in the Diocese long enough (20 years) to realise how much better things are now in the Diocese than they used to be. This is a significant fact, and those of us, like myself, who can be quite critical of things diocesan, need to note it, give credit where credit is due, and praise to God.
I especially liked the warm atmosphere, the excellent organisation, the chance to meet old friends, and the clear Christ-centred creedal orthodoxy that was the beating heart of the event. Paula Gooder's bible studies and Graham Cray's talk were particular highlights in the conference whose theme was 'Renew, Revive, Refresh.'
On the last day of the conference each of us were anointed with oil and recommissioned for God's service, as we sung that ancient hymn to the Holy Spirit, traditionally sung as part of the ordination service:
Come, Holy Ghost, our souls inspire, and lighten with celestial fire. Thou the anointing Spirit art, who dost thy sevenfold gifts impart.
Thy blessed unction from above is comfort, life, and fire of love. Enable with perpetual light the dullness of our blinded sight.
Anoint and cheer our soiled face with the abundance of thy grace. Keep far from foes, give peace at home: where thou art guide, no ill can come.
Teach us to know the Father, Son, and thee, of both, to be but One, that through the ages all along, this may be our endless song:
Praise to thy eternal merit, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Prior to that a wonderfully crafted, deeply thoughtful sermon by the Bishop of Southwark was greeted - most unusually - by prolonged applause from all present. It expressed our respect and affection for our soon-to-retire pastor-in-chief.
Few preachers have been the subject of poems, but William Cowper (pictured left) (1731-1800) was so impressed with the preaching of Charles Simeon that he was moved to laud Simeon's qualities in verse.
I am doing a dissertation partly based on Simeon's work so I'm taking quite an interest in CS, who, incidentally celebrated his 250th birthday last week. The Church of England Newspaper marked it with a special article, and Simeon's Trustees are circulating a leaflet to the all the congregations, including our own, of which they are patrons.
Here's Cowper's poem about Simeon:
with a smile Gentle and affable, and full of grace As fearful of offending whom he wish'd Much to persuade, he plied his ear with truths Not harshly thunder'd forth or rudely press'd But, like his purpose, gracious, kind, and sweet
Sarah Wise's The Blackest Streets: the Life and Death of a Victorian Slum is a brilliantly told piece of social history about 'the Nichol,' a rabbit warren of narrow streets and passage ways in Bethnal Green which contained some of the very worse slums of Victorian London.
Families with five or six children shared a single room in filthy, dilapidated houses that were totally unfit for human habitation.
Spineless officials and corrupt landlords conspired to keep the poor very poor, and their accommodation unspeakable.
Wise's wonderfully researched books helps us to hear the voices of the people who lived there, and of the clergy, missionaries and medical staff who worked there.
In the end the Nichol was demolished to be replaced with some of the very first council housing ever built in this country - these blocks, now Grade II listed still survive. But the very poor either couldn't afford the new housing or found flat-living uncongenial. It was the next group up in society who moved to the new Nichol - the original residents moved elsewhere.
Introducing the immobile phone - a brilliant invention with all the advantages of the mobile without any of the tiresome disadvantages of our little pocket friend.
Just plug your IP into a socket in the wall of your home and you can speak to anyone anywhere in the world. Then tuck your mobile away at the back of your sock drawer and you need never be troubled by it again.
Now you can savour a quiet walk in the country without being interrupted with odd enquiries from people you would prefer not to hear from, or a vain attempts to sell you double glazing or a holiday in Florida.
No more will you suffer the embarassment of your phone interrupting weddings, funerals, bar mitzvahs, plays and films with ludicrous sounding ring tones, nor will you ever again feel impelled to announce to an entire railway carriage in a VERY LOUD VOICE 'I'm on the train.'
The second of a series of blog entries on the three party conferences.
No Labour government has ever been in power as long as this one, but after twelve years its get harder and harder to resist those who say it is 'time for a change.'
It is Gordon Brown's misfortune to take up office in No.10 at just this moment - when the Government appears to be coming to the end of its natural life and the financial system is in crisis. Almost irrespective of what Gordon says or does, the electoral odds are stacked against him.
Historically, one could say the strength of Labour has been in the area of social justice, its abiding weakness the tendency to tell every one what to do and over-regulate. Both tendencies have been amply seen in the present government, which has overseen progressive social reforms such as the minimum wage, whilst creating huge red-tape bound bureacratic solutions to a host of social and political problems.
Then there is Iraq. Then there is what appears to be a gradual erosion of free speech and other civil liberties.
The Labour Party has made an incalculable contribution to national life, since its foundation a century ago. We have Labour to thank for the NHS and manyf other reforms, but can Labour win a fourth election in a row, or does it need time in the political wilderness to regroup and renew itself?
Welcome to my blog, Redhill Thoughts, a collection of musings and reflections about buildings, books and the Bible.
Why Redhill thoughts? Redhill is the town in Surrey where I live and where since 2001 I have had the great privilege and joy to be the vicar of Holy Trinity Church.